Bush on Cloning :: essays research papers

Human re-create is the laboratory output of individuals who be genetically identical to an opposite human being. Cloning is achieved by putting the genetic material from a donor into a womans egg, which has had its marrow removed. As a result, the new or cloned embryo is an identical sham of only the donor. Human clone has moved from science fiction into science. hotshot biotech company has already began producing embryonic human clones for question purposes. Chinese scientists require derived base cells from cloned embryos created by combining human DNA and rabbit eggs. Others put up announced plans to produce cloned children, despite the fact that laboratory cloning of animals has melt to spontaneous abortions and terrible, terrible abnormalities. Human cloning is deeply troubling to me, and to around Americans. Life is a creation, not a commodity. (Applause.) Our children are gifts to be love and protected, not products to be designed and manufactured. Allowing cloni ng would be taking a significant step toward a society in which human beings are grown for spare body parts, and children are engineered to custom specifications and thats not acceptable. In the current debate over human cloning, two terms are being used reproductive cloning and research cloning. Reproductive cloning involves creating a cloned embryo and implanting it into a woman with the goal of creating a child. Fortunately, tight every American agrees that this practice should be banned. Research cloning, on the other hand, involves the creation of cloned human embryos which are then destroyed to derive stem cells. I believe all human cloning is wrong, and both forms of cloning ought to be banned, for the following reasons. First, anything other than a total ban on human cloning would be unethical. Research cloning would contradict the approximately fundamental principle of medical ethics, that no human life should be exploited or extinguished for the benefit of another. (Appl ause.) Yet a faithfulness permitting research cloning, while forbidding the birth of a cloned child, would require the end of nascent human life. Secondly, anything other than a total ban on human cloning would be virtually impossible to enforce. Cloned human embryos created for research would be widely available in laboratories and embryo farms. Once cloned embryos were available, nidation would take place. Even the tightest regulations and strict policing would not prevent or spy the birth of cloned babies. Third, the benefits of research cloning are highly speculative.