The French Revolution :: essays research papers

The cut Revolution was an unst fit, blood-filled time. With 20,000 sent to theguillotine and an adjoin number to prison, it is not to a great extent to find importance but earlier tofind meaning. The most crucial thing to look for in the diversity is justification, reasonsthat excuse or bring significance to the deaths of many. John Locke, a philosophe of thetime, may curb argued that a leader who does not provide his people with nontransferablerights is grounds for dismissal in the form of regicide1. On the other pass a representation ThomasHobbes, excessively a philosopher, may have taken a different argument. It was his belief thatman is a brute, therefore he needs a dictator to keep the peace. John Lockes rarifiedview point if practiced properly could have provided the lower discriminate of France withequality, something the were desperately in need of. The Thomas Hobbes approachwhich advocates control, could not have provided the people with such liberation, but int heory should be able to maintain the peace among the people, the peace that seemed solacking during the French Revolution. The French Revolution was a disaster for thefollowing reasons it happened also fast, it went too far, and it achieved too little.     Thomas Paine a radical thinker of the era once utter Time makes more convertsthan reason. With this quote we can see why revolution was successful in England, butnot France. England slowly utilise the Magna Carta (1213), Petition of Rights (1628), andthe Habeas Corpus Act (1679) to limit its monarch. It was a extensive road that was by nomeans perfect. With monarchs who paid little vigilance to the act(s) in place during theirreign and parliament, like James (1603-1625) and Charles I (1625-1649) it was hard tosee progress quickly. These acts played a vital role in Britains journey to democracy,through them came proper representation of the people, equality, and what is now cognizeas the Glorious Revolutio n.      France seemed to be on its way to a similar fate. In 1789, the Estates-General2had now received a expect of a head count from Louis XVI. Prior to this time the very outsized third estate3 (26 million) had the same number of representatives in theEstates-General as the first estate4 (100,000) and the act estate5 (400,000) combined. Once the Estates-General had been renamed the National Assembly by the third estate aconstitution was in the works. During this time the people of France became restless,food shortages plagued the country side. It also appeared that Louis XVI might dissolve